These rascals, they say that these mlecchas and yavanas cannot become Brāhmin. Because we are making Brāhmins from the mlecchas and yavanas section, they are protesting. Some of them are protesting that "Swami Bhaktivedanta is ruining Hindu religion." The rascals, they do not know that I am acting strictly according to śāstra. The śāstras says . . . Kṛṣṇa says Himself, māṁ hi pārtha vyapāśritya ye 'pi syuḥ pāpa-yonayaḥ (BG 9.32): "Anyone born in low-grade family," pāpa-yoni, māṁ hi pārtha vyapāśritya, "if he takes to Me according to regulative principles," vyapāśritya, "according to the principle," te 'pi yānti parāṁ gatim, "he is immediately becomes eligible to be promoted," parāṁ gatim, "the highest perfection of life."
One thing is pāpa-yoni. So there is no restriction that pāpa-yoni shall remain always pāpa-yoni. Why? They should be given enlightenment. That is Brāhmin-ism. Brāhmin means liberal, and just the opposite word of Brāhmin is kṛpaṇa, miser. A Brāhmin should give chance to everyone, even to the pāpa-yoni, how to become Brāhmin. That is real Brāhmin. And the rascal who thinks that, "I shall remain simply Brāhmin; others shall remain mlecchas and yavanas," he is not Brāhmin; he is Śūdra, because his mind is so crippled. He does not want to see others to become Brāhmin. He is miser, kṛpaṇa. Kṛpaṇaḥ phala-hetavaḥ (BG 2.49).