The urine may be bad, the stool may be bad, but because you passed urine or stool, you are not bad. Is it clear? Krsna has got this external energy. That does not make Krsna bad. Try to understand it

Expressions researched:
"The urine may be bad, the stool may be bad, but because you passed urine or stool, you are not bad. Is it clear? Kṛṣṇa has got this external energy. That does not make Kṛṣṇa bad. Try to understand it"

Lectures

General Lectures

The urine may be bad, the stool may be bad, but because you passed urine or stool, you are not bad. Is it clear? Kṛṣṇa has got this external energy. That does not make Kṛṣṇa bad. Try to understand it. If somebody asks, "Oh, you are so nice girl, nice . . . why you are passing stool and urine?" is that any argument? I am just speaking on the argument's sake.

690305 - Lecture - Day after Sri Gaura-Purnima - Hawaii

Girl devotee: Why does Kṛṣṇa have an external energy?

Prabhupāda: Why not? First of all say why not. What is your objection?

Girl devotee: Well, if He is pure, everything about Him is . . .

Prabhupāda: He is pure. He is pure, always pure. Suppose you are very nice girl, nice, but because you pass some urine or stool, does it mean that you are bad?

Girl devotee: No.

Prabhupāda: Does it mean? Then? The urine may be bad, the stool may be bad, but because you passed urine or stool, you are not bad. Is it clear? Kṛṣṇa has got this external energy. That does not make Kṛṣṇa bad. Try to understand it.

If somebody asks, "Oh, you are so nice girl, nice . . . why you are passing stool and urine?" is that any argument? I am just speaking on the argument's sake. Is that any good argument that, "Because we are very good, we shall not pass stool and urine"? Or "Because you are very good, therefore your urine and stool also will be very good"? Is that any argument?