Collaborate with us to invoke and fully manifest Srila Prabhupada's Vani-presence

Go to Vanipedia | Go to Vanisource | Go to Vanimedia

Vaniquotes - the compiled essence of Vedic knowledge

Special

Related changes

← Category:Was Not

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide anonymous users | Hide my edits | Hide bots | Hide minor edits
Show new changes starting from 22:37, 10 June 2024

List of abbreviations:

N: This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
m: This is a minor edit
b: This edit was performed by a bot
(±123): The page size changed by this number of bytes

10 June 2024

14:58

Brahma, who was not born of a material source but of the lotus flower coming out of the navel abdomen of the Lord, is the creator of all those who are materially born. Of course, by the grace of the Lord, Brahma was able to see the form of the Lord‎ diffhist −15‎ Deepali talk contribs

14:34

Brahma was completely mystified. He could not understand what he was seeing, and then he was not even able to see. Lord Krsna, understanding Brahma's position, then removed that yogamaya covering‎ diffhist −8‎ Deepali talk contribs

8 June 2024

			12:32		Maharaja Yudhisthira was not a typically unenlightened political leader of modern democracy. Maharaja Yudhisthira was instructed by Bhismadeva and the infallible Lord also, and therefore he had full knowledge of everything in perfection‎‎ 2 changes history +22‎ [Nabakumar‎ (2×)]
					12:32 (cur \| prev) +32‎ Nabakumar talk contribs
					12:31 (cur \| prev) −10‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

7 June 2024

11:22

Because he (Prthu Maharaja) had just been coronated he could not manifest his godly qualities in action. Therefore he was not willing to accept the praise of the devotees‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

6 June 2024

09:05

When Pariksit was cursed by a brahmin to die within seven days, why Krsna did not save him, or why he did not seek Krsna's protection? This question may be raised. He was young man. He was not old man. He could live. That question was made‎ diffhist +40‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

08:31

We get this historical event from the Srimad-Bhagavatam, that during the time of Maharaja Prthu there was scarcity of food, so the King wanted to punish the earthly deity, because she was not supplying food‎ diffhist −4‎ Deepali talk contribs

08:10

As one of the demigods, the earthly planet was taking her share in the yajnas but in return she was not producing sufficient food grains. Prthu Maharaja was therefore justified in threatening to punish her for her offense‎ diffhist −12‎ Deepali talk contribs

06:15

The word nirvisangah ("uncontaminated") is very significant because Maharaja Prthu was not attached to the results of his activities. In this material world a person is always thinking of the proprietorship of everything he accumulates or works for‎ diffhist +13‎ Deepali talk contribs

04:57

If Pariksit Maharaja was not in this position, that he was to die within seven days, this Bhagavata would not have come. This is the purport. That was the purpose. Otherwise, he could counteract‎ diffhist +18‎ Nabakumar talk contribs

5 June 2024

06:17

Reciters like the suta & the magadha were confidentially aware that Prthu was an incarnation of the Personality of God. Although He denied such praise because he was not at that time exhibiting his godly qualities, the reciters did not stop praising him‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

06:13

Maharaja Prthu was a directly empowered incarnation of Lord Visnu; therefore he was not subject to the reactions of pious or impious activities‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

05:35

Whether he could soon be relieved from the dangerous position of materialistic existence. This was not a question personally for Prthu Maharaja‎ diffhist +2‎ Deepali talk contribs

4 June 2024

06:56

He (Vijitasva) received this title from Indra, and it refers to the time when Indra stole Maharaja Prthu's horse from the sacrificial arena. Indra was not visible to others when he was stealing the horse, but Maharaja Prthu's son Vijitasva could see him‎ diffhist −10‎ Deepali talk contribs

06:36

Maharaja Prthu, wiping the tears from his eyes, tried to look upon the Lord, but it appeared that the King was not fully satisfied by looking at Him. Thus the King offered the following prayers‎ diffhist +13‎ Deepali talk contribs

05:35

The Queen (Arci) was completely aware that her husband (King Prthu) was not dead, although the symptoms of life - action, intelligence and sense perception - had ceased‎ diffhist −37‎ Deepali talk contribs

3 June 2024

07:03

Why should mother Laksmi, the mother of the universe, be angry with an insignificant devotee like Prthu Maharaja? All this was not very likely. Yet Prthu Maharaja, just for his personal protection, appealed to the Lord to take his part‎ diffhist +13‎ Deepali talk contribs

2 June 2024

13:45

As we have already explained previously, when a living being is specifically empowered by the Supreme Lord to act for a particular purpose, he is called a saktyavesa-avatara. Prthu Maharaja was not only a saktyavesa-avatara but also a great devotee‎ diffhist +44‎ Visnu Murti talk contribs

13:44

Although Maharaja Prthu was simply enthroned on the royal seat and was not at that time exhibiting his godly powers, the reciters like the suta, the magadha and the vandi understood that King Prthu was an incarnation of God‎ diffhist +12‎ Deepali talk contribs

1 June 2024

07:40

For ten days I was staying in Risikesh in a very nice house on the side of the Ganges River. But my health was not good and so I have come to Vrndavana where I will stay indefinitely‎ diffhist +37‎ Elaine talk contribs

29 May 2024

06:24

The Queen (Arci) was completely aware that her husband (King Prthu) was not dead, although the symptoms of life - action, intelligence and sense perception - had ceased‎ diffhist +26‎ Deepali talk contribs

28 May 2024

N 04:15

Although he (Arjuna) was born in royal family, but he was not a Vedanti or vast scholar in Vedic literature. No. But he was bhakta. That is the qualification. He was a devotee‎ diffhist +2,598‎ Soham talk contribs (Created page with "<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Although he was born in royal family, but he was not a Vedāntī or vast scholar in Vedic literature. No. But he was bhakta. That is the qualification. He was a devotee"}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Soham}} {{complete|}} {{goal|0}} {{first|2024-05-28T04:15:39.000Z}} {{last|2024-05-28T04:15:39.000Z}} {{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}} {{total|1}} {{toc right}} Category:Although Category:Arjuna's Fa...")

Retrieved from "https://vaniquotes.org/wiki/Special:RecentChangesLinked"