All public logs
Combined display of all available logs of Vaniquotes. You can narrow down the view by selecting a log type, the username (case-sensitive), or the affected page (also case-sensitive).
- 11:06, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page If you are still thinking that you are this material body -- you are Indian, you are American, you are brahmana, you are sudra, you are white, you are black -- then you are in the dog's consciousness, not Krsna consciousness. That is to be learned (content was: '#REDIRECT If you are still thinking that you are this material body - you are Indian, you are American, you are brahmana, you are sudra, you are white, you …' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 11:05, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page If you are still thinking that you are this material body -- you are Indian, you are American, you are brahmana, you are sudra, you are white, you are black -- then you are in the dog's consciousness, not Krsna consciousness. That is to be learned to If you are still thinking that you are this material body - you are Indian, you are American, you are brahmana, you are sudra, you are white, you are black - then you are in the dog's consciousness, not Krsna consciousness. That is to be learned
- 10:57, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page That is Krsna's... So don't think that Krsna consciousness movement, those who are Krsna conscious, they'll become lazy and imitate Haridasa Thakura. That is not Krsna consciousness (content was: '#REDIRECT Don't think that Krsna consciousness movement, those who are Krsna conscious, they'll become lazy and imitate Haridasa Thakura. That is not Krsna …' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 10:54, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page That is Krsna's... So don't think that Krsna consciousness movement, those who are Krsna conscious, they'll become lazy and imitate Haridasa Thakura. That is not Krsna consciousness to Don't think that Krsna consciousness movement, those who are Krsna conscious, they'll become lazy and imitate Haridasa Thakura. That is not Krsna consciousness
- 10:30, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Because you are not Krsna consciousness, you are discriminating in this way, that the human society should be given protection, the animal society should be slaughtered. Is that very good (content was: '#REDIRECT Because you are not Krsna consciousness, you are discriminating in this way, that the human society should be given protection, the animal society…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 10:30, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Because you are not Krsna consciousness, you are discriminating in this way, that the human society should be given protection, the animal society should be slaughtered. Is that very good to Because you are not Krsna consciousness, you are discriminating in this way, that the human society should be given protection, the animal society should be slaughtered. Is that very good?
- 10:04, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page When you work, when you work for Krsna with love and enthusiasm, that is your Krsna conscious life. If you think that "It is hackneyed, it is troublesome, but what can I do? These people ask me to do it. I have to do it," that is not Krsna consciousness (content was: '#REDIRECT When you work for Krsna with love and enthusiasm, that is your Krsna conscious life. If you think that "It is hackneyed, it is troublesome, but wh…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 10:03, 13 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page When you work, when you work for Krsna with love and enthusiasm, that is your Krsna conscious life. If you think that "It is hackneyed, it is troublesome, but what can I do? These people ask me to do it. I have to do it," that is not Krsna consciousness to When you work for Krsna with love and enthusiasm, that is your Krsna conscious life. If you think that "It is hackneyed, it is troublesome, but what can I do? These people ask me to do it. I have to do it," that is not Krsna consciousness
- 13:48, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Just like the other day one rascal was asking -- he is not a surrendered soul -- "Swamiji, you know Krsna consciousness?" Just see. So this is not the process of question (content was: '#REDIRECT Just like the other day one rascal was asking - he is not a surrendered soul - "Swamiji, you know Krsna consciousness?" Just see. So this is not t…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 13:38, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Just like the other day one rascal was asking -- he is not a surrendered soul -- "Swamiji, you know Krsna consciousness?" Just see. So this is not the process of question to Just like the other day one rascal was asking - he is not a surrendered soul - "Swamiji, you know Krsna consciousness?" Just see. So this is not the process of question
- 10:30, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page . When guru speaks, you cannot argue. That is not the process. You should accept a guru who is infallible. Otherwise it is useless. He accepted guru Krsna because Krsna is infallible (content was: '#REDIRECT When guru speaks, you cannot argue. That is not the process. You should accept a guru who is infallible. Otherwise it is useless. He accepted guru…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 10:29, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page . When guru speaks, you cannot argue. That is not the process. You should accept a guru who is infallible. Otherwise it is useless. He accepted guru Krsna because Krsna is infallible to When guru speaks, you cannot argue. That is not the process. You should accept a guru who is infallible. Otherwise it is useless. He accepted guru Krsna because Krsna is infallible
- 09:34, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page They (atheists) go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing -- they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squeezing. Moghasa mogha-karmanah. That is not the process to find out real pleasure (content was: '#REDIRECT They (atheists) go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing - they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squeez…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 09:33, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page They (atheists) go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing -- they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squeezing. Moghasa mogha-karmanah. That is not the process to find out real pleasure to They (atheists) go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing - they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squeezing. Moghasa mogha-karmanah. That is not the process to find out real pleasure
- 09:24, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page They go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing -- they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squeezing. Moghasa mogha-karmanah. That is not the process to find out real pleasure (content was: '#REDIRECT They (atheists) go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing -- they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squee…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 09:21, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page They go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing -- they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squeezing. Moghasa mogha-karmanah. That is not the process to find out real pleasure to They (atheists) go to enjoy, fifty thousand dollars, hundred thousand dollars, squeezing -- they do not find any pleasure. Simply squeezing, squeezing. Moghasa mogha-karmanah. That is not the process to find out real pleasure
- 08:39, 12 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page "not the process" (content was: '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Narottama}} {{complete|}} {{goal|0}} {{first|12Jun12}} {{last|12Jun12}} {{totals_by_s…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 14:51, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena (content was: '#REDIRECT The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena"' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 14:51, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena to The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena"
- 14:27, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena (content was: '#REDIRECT The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena"' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 14:27, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena" (content was: '#REDIRECT The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 14:27, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena" to The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena
- 14:25, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena to The Vedic mantra says, nayam atma pravacanena labhyo na medhaya na bahuna srutena: "Atma, the supreme self, cannot be realized pravacanena"
- 09:34, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Therefore we are chanting the supreme Name-Krsna (content was: '#REDIRECT Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Ther…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 09:34, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Therefore we are chanting the supreme Name-Krsna to Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Therefore we are chanting the supreme Name - Krsna
- 09:25, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Therefore we are chanting the supreme Name—Krsna. (content was: '#REDIRECT Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Ther…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 09:24, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Therefore we are chanting the supreme Name—Krsna. to Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Therefore we are chanting the supreme Name-Krsna
- 09:20, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfectionTherefore we are chanting the supreme Name—Krsna. to Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection. Therefore we are chanting the supreme Name—Krsna.
- 09:13, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfection to Omkara is there, and one may chant Omkara and achieve impersonal realization. But we are Vaisnavas and we are seeking the supreme perfectionTherefore we are chanting the supreme Name—Krsna.
- 09:04, 11 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page "There is no servant in this world more dear to Me than he, nor will there ever be one more dear.'' So that will be the supreme perfection of our existence, to come to that point of being best friend, best devotee of Krishna (content was: '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"[Bg. 18.69] There is no servant in this world more dear to Me than he, nor will there ever be one more dear.'…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 16:26, 10 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page You become dear to Krsna. That is your perfection, highest perfection, supreme perfection. So such easy thing, and such highest perfection. Why people should not accept this (content was: '#REDIRECT You become dear to Krsna. That is your perfection, highest perfection, supreme perfection. So such easy thing, and such highest perfection. Why pe…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 16:25, 10 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page You become dear to Krsna. That is your perfection, highest perfection, supreme perfection. So such easy thing, and such highest perfection. Why people should not accept this to You become dear to Krsna. That is your perfection, highest perfection, supreme perfection. So such easy thing, and such highest perfection. Why people should not accept this?
- 09:52, 10 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page It is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not by the eyes. This is not recommended. Nobody says, "I want to see knowledge," no: "I want to hear knowledge (content was: '#REDIRECT Knowledge means not to see but to hear. Therefore it is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not …' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 09:51, 10 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page It is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not by the eyes. This is not recommended. Nobody says, "I want to see knowledge," no: "I want to hear knowledge to Knowledge means not to see but to hear. Therefore it is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not by the eyes. This is not recommended. Nobody says, "I want to see knowledge," no: "I want to hear knowledge
- 09:12, 10 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Therefore it is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not by the eyes. This is not recommended. Nobody says, "I want to see knowledge," no: "I want to hear knowledge (content was: '#REDIRECT It is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not by the eyes. This is not recommended. Nobody says,…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 09:11, 10 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Therefore it is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not by the eyes. This is not recommended. Nobody says, "I want to see knowledge," no: "I want to hear knowledge to It is called sruti, susruma. Knowledge has to be received through the ear, not by the eyes. Not by the eyes. This is not recommended. Nobody says, "I want to see knowledge," no: "I want to hear knowledge
- 17:15, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aural reception from the spiritual master to the student. This is the way. It is coming (content was: '#REDIRECT Ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aura…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 17:15, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page Ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aural reception from the spiritual master to the student. This is the way. It is coming to Ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aural reception from the spiritual master to the student. This is the way
- 17:12, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page So ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aural reception from the spiritual master to the student. This is the way. It is coming (content was: '#REDIRECT Ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aura…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 17:12, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page So ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aural reception from the spiritual master to the student. This is the way. It is coming to Ascending process is not recommended in the Vedic process of knowledge. Vedic way of receiving knowledge -- by aural reception, by submissive aural reception from the spiritual master to the student. This is the way. It is coming
- 16:31, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page So if we want to stop this miserable condition of getting another material body, then we must know what is karma, what is vikarma. That is Krsna's proposal (content was: '#REDIRECT If we want to stop this miserable condition of getting another material body, then we must know what is karma, what is vikarma. That is Krsna's pr…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 16:27, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page So if we want to stop this miserable condition of getting another material body, then we must know what is karma, what is vikarma. That is Krsna's proposal to If we want to stop this miserable condition of getting another material body, then we must know what is karma, what is vikarma. That is Krsna's proposal
- 10:30, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page . Lord Krsna meditated upon Himself every morning as a grhastha, and similarly Lord Ramacandra performed yajnas to satisfy Himself, but this does not mean that an ordinary living being should imitate the Lord by accepting the process of ahangraha-upasana (content was: '#REDIRECT Lord Krsna meditated upon Himself every morning as a grhastha, and similarly Lord Ramacandra performed yajnas to satisfy Himself, but this does no…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 10:29, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page . Lord Krsna meditated upon Himself every morning as a grhastha, and similarly Lord Ramacandra performed yajnas to satisfy Himself, but this does not mean that an ordinary living being should imitate the Lord by accepting the process of ahangraha-upasana to Lord Krsna meditated upon Himself every morning as a grhastha, and similarly Lord Ramacandra performed yajnas to satisfy Himself, but this does not mean that an ordinary living being should imitate the Lord by accepting the process of ahangraha-upasana
- 09:08, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Everyone loves himself, and when he becomes more advanced, he loves the Supersoul also. A person who is self-realized does not recommend the worship of anyone but the Supersoul (content was: '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|}} {{notes|}} {{compiler|Narottama}} {{complete|}} {{goal|0}} {{first|08Jun12}} {{last|08Jun12}} {{totals_by_s…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 08:46, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page The essential point is that the mind, which is contaminated by material attraction, has to be bridled and concentrated on the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It cannot be fixed on something void or impersonal. (content was: '#REDIRECT The essential point is that the mind, which is contaminated by material attraction, has to be bridled and concentrated on the Supreme Personality …' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 08:44, 8 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page The essential point is that the mind, which is contaminated by material attraction, has to be bridled and concentrated on the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It cannot be fixed on something void or impersonal. to The essential point is that the mind, which is contaminated by material attraction, has to be bridled and concentrated on the Supreme Personality of Godhead. It cannot be fixed on something void or impersonal
- 17:50, 7 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page But the merchant should not think that because he is engaged in an occupation in which the telling of lies is compulsory, he should give up his profession and pursue the profession of a brahmana. That is not recommended (content was: '#REDIRECT The merchant should not think that because he is engaged in an occupation in which the telling of lies is compulsory, he should give up his profes…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))
- 17:49, 7 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs moved page But the merchant should not think that because he is engaged in an occupation in which the telling of lies is compulsory, he should give up his profession and pursue the profession of a brahmana. That is not recommended to The merchant should not think that because he is engaged in an occupation in which the telling of lies is compulsory, he should give up his profession and pursue the profession of a brahmana. That is not recommended
- 09:44, 7 June 2012 Narottama talk contribs deleted page Those who undergo severe austerities not recommended in the scriptures, out of pride, impelled by lust and attachment, who are foolish and who torture the material elements of the body as well as the Supersoul dwelling within, are to be known as demons (content was: '<div id="compilation"> <div id="facts"> {{terms|"Those who undergo severe austerities and penances not recommended in the scriptures, performing them out of p…' (and the only contributor was 'Narottama'))