View source for Let Krsna pass any amount of stool and urine. We have nothing to do with that. So let there be external energy

<div id="compilation">
<div id="facts">
{{terms|"Let Kṛṣṇa pass any amount of stool and urine. We have nothing to do with that. So let there be external energy"}}
{{notes|}}
{{compiler|Soham}}
{{complete|ALL}}
{{first|2024-02-19T15:14:31.000Z}}
{{last|2024-02-19T15:14:31.000Z}}
{{totals_by_section|BG=0|SB=0|CC=0|OB=0|Lec=1|Con=0|Let=0}}
{{total|1}}
{{toc right}}
[[Category:Letting Krsna]]
[[Category:Krsna's Passing]]
[[Category:Amount]]
[[Category:Stool]]
[[Category:Urine]]
[[Category:We Have]]
[[Category:Have Nothing To Do With]]
[[Category:Krsna's External Energy]]
[[Category:Pages Needing Audio - SOHAM]]
</div>
<div id="section">
<h2>Lectures</h2>
</div>
<div id="sub_section">
<h3>General Lectures</h3>
</div>
<div class="quote">
<div class="quote_heading">
If we are confident about Kṛṣṇa's goodness, why should we bother about Kṛṣṇa's stool and urine? Why not directly Kṛṣṇa? Let Kṛṣṇa pass any amount of stool and urine. We have nothing to do with that. So let there be external energy.
</div>

<div class="quote_link">
[[Vanisource:690305 - Lecture - Day after Sri Gaura-Purnima - Hawaii|690305 - Lecture - Day after Sri Gaura-Purnima - Hawaii]]
</div>
<div class="text">
If somebody asks, "Oh, you are so nice girl, nice . . . why you are passing stool and urine?" is that any argument? I am just speaking on the argument's sake. Is that any good argument that, "Because we are very good, we shall not pass stool and urine"? Or "Because you are very good, therefore your urine and stool also will be very good"? Is that any argument?

So similarly, if Kṛṣṇa has created this external energy, that is for His satisfaction. That's all. But why should you take? If you are . . . if we are confident about Kṛṣṇa's goodness, why should we bother about Kṛṣṇa's stool and urine? Why not directly Kṛṣṇa? Let Kṛṣṇa pass any amount of stool and urine. We have nothing to do with that. So let there be external energy.

We have nothing to do with that. You cannot say: "Oh, Kṛṣṇa is all-good. Therefore His urine and stool . . ." I am . . . just try to understand. His urine is also good. That is a different thing. I mean to say, if this is an argument that, "Because Kṛṣṇa is good, He should not pass urine and stool," that is no argument.
</div>
</div>
</div>