Search by property

This page provides a simple browsing interface for finding entities described by a property and a named value. Other available search interfaces include the page property search, and the ask query builder.

List of results

• In the beginning of this book we have discussed that when Krsna appears, all His incarnations, plenary portions and portions of the plenary portions come with Him  + (17:22:54, 30 April 2017)
• There is a similar statement by a person fallen in the hellish condition of life. He addressed the Supreme Lord thus: "My dear Lord, Yamaraja has placed me in a situation which is full of filthy and obnoxious smells"  + (17:23:24, 30 April 2017)
• Some of His different pastimes are manifested not by the original Krsna Himself but by His expansions  + (17:25:34, 30 April 2017)
• The fallen person continued, "There are so many insects and worms, surrounded by the stools left by different kinds of diseased persons. And after visualizing this horrible scene, my eyes have become sore, and I am becoming nearly blind"  + (17:25:48, 30 April 2017)
• The fallen person continued, "I therefore pray, O my Lord, O deliverer from the hellish conditions of life. I have fallen into this hell, but I shall try to remember Your holy name always, and in this way I shall try to keep my body and soul together"  + (17:27:58, 30 April 2017)
• Why Arjuna was puzzled by Krsna's going to see Karanarnavasayi Visnu in the spiritual world is fully discussed in the commentaries of Srila Visvanatha Cakravarti Thakura, as follows  + (17:28:32, 30 April 2017)
• Sukadeva Gosvami's recommendation to leave home and go to the forest in search of Krsna is not for immature persons. Maharaja Pariksit was mature. Even in his householder life, or from the very beginning of his life, he worshiped Lord Krsna's murti  + (17:29:34, 30 April 2017)
• It is to be understood that any person who is constantly engaged in chanting the holy names of the Lord, Hare Krsna, Hare Krsna, Krsna Krsna, Hare Hare, Hare Rama, Hare Rama, Rama Rama, Hare Hare, has attained a transcendental affection for Krsna  + (17:30:12, 30 April 2017)
• As such, in any condition of life, he remains satisfied simply by remembering the Lord's name in full affection and ecstatic love  + (17:31:42, 30 April 2017)
• In his childhood he (Maharaja Pariksit) worshiped the Deity of Lord Krsna, and later, although he was a householder, he was always detached  + (17:31:57, 30 April 2017)
• It is understood from the speech of Maha-Visnu that He was very eager to see Krsna. It may be said, however, that since Maha-Visnu took away the brahmana's sons, He must certainly have gone to Dvaraka to do so. Therefore, why did He not see Krsna there?  + (17:33:27, 30 April 2017)
• In conclusion, it may be stated that the ecstatic love for Krsna in ghastliness appears during the development of dormant neutrality into developed affection  + (17:33:49, 30 April 2017)
• When he (Maharaja Pariksit) got the notice of his death, he immediately gave up all connection with household life and sat down on the bank of the Ganges to hear Srimad-Bhagavatam in the association of devotees  + (17:34:31, 30 April 2017)
• This is another instance of ecstatic love for Krsna in an abominable situation  + (17:35:26, 30 April 2017)
• As already described, there are twelve different kinds of rasas, or ecstatic relationships which are shared with Krsna  + (17:37:53, 30 April 2017)
• Five of these rasas are direct, and they are listed as neutrality, servitude, fraternal love, parental love and conjugal love. Seven of the rasas are indirect, and they are listed as humor, astonishment, chivalry, compassion, anger, dread and ghastliness  + (17:39:59, 30 April 2017)
• Here (in Gokula Vrndavana) Krsna displays His transcendental pastimes in the material world  + (17:42:06, 30 April 2017)
• The following is a scientific analysis of the compatibility and incompatibility of the mixtures of these various rasas, or loving moods  + (17:44:43, 30 April 2017)
• If that is so, the next question is this: Why would Maha-Visnu come to Dvaraka personally if He were not able to see Krsna? Why did He not send some of His associates to take away the sons of the brahmana?  + (17:45:49, 30 April 2017)
• When in the rasa of neutral love (santa-rasa) there are found traces of ghastliness or astonishment, the result is compatible. When with this neutral love there are manifestations of conjugal love, chivalry, anger or dread, the result is incompatible  + (17:47:37, 30 April 2017)
• When in the ecstasy of a serving humor there are manifestations of dread, neutral love or chivalry (such as dharma-vira and dana-vira), the result is compatible  + (17:50:07, 30 April 2017)
• A possible answer is that it is very difficult to put any of the citizens of Dvaraka into trouble in the presence of Krsna  + (17:51:15, 30 April 2017)
• The ecstasy of devotional service in chivalry (yuddha-vira) and anger are directly produced by Krsna Himself  + (17:52:01, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of fraternal love a mixture of conjugal love, laughter or chivalry is highly compatible. With the same fraternal love, a mixture of dread or parental love is most incompatible  + (17:53:40, 30 April 2017)
• Although there are gulfs of differences between them, with the ecstasy of parental affection a mixture of laughter, compassion or dread is compatible  + (17:55:27, 30 April 2017)

• Therefore, because it was not possible for any of Maha-Visnu's associates to take away the brahmana's sons, He personally came to take them  + (17:55:33, 30 April 2017)

• With the ecstasy of parental love a mixture of conjugal love, chivalry or anger is incompatible  + (17:56:55, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of devotion in conjugal love a mixture of laughter or fraternity is compatible  + (17:58:04, 30 April 2017)
• Another question may also be raised: The Lord is known as brahmanya-deva, the worshipable Deity of the brahmanas  + (17:58:23, 30 April 2017)
• According to certain expert opinions, in the ecstasy of conjugal love the feelings of chivalry known as yuddha-vira and dharma-vira are the only compatible additions  + (17:59:30, 30 April 2017)
• According to this view, except for these two humors, all other manifestations are taken as incompatible with conjugal love  + (18:01:27, 30 April 2017)
• Why was He (the Lord) inclined to put a brahmana into such a terrible condition of lamentation over one son after another until the tenth son was taken away?  + (18:01:39, 30 April 2017)
• Although giving trouble to a brahmana is a forbidden act, Lord Visnu was prepared to do anything in order to see Krsna - He was so eager to see Him  + (18:04:37, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of devotional laughter a mixture of dread, conjugal love or parental love is compatible, whereas a mixture of compassion or ghastliness is incompatible  + (18:08:04, 30 April 2017)
• After losing each of his sons, the brahmana would come to the gate of the palace and accuse the King of not being able to give the brahmanas protection and of thus being unfit to sit on the royal throne  + (18:08:07, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of devotion in astonishment a mixture of chivalry or neutral love is compatible, whereas a mixture of anger or dread is always incompatible  + (18:09:45, 30 April 2017)
• It was Maha-Visnu's plan that the brahmana would accuse the ksatriyas and Krsna, and Krsna would be obliged to come see Him to take back the brahmana's sons  + (18:10:42, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of devotional chivalry a mixture of astonishment, laughter or servitude is compatible, whereas a mixture of dread or conjugal love is incompatible  + (18:11:16, 30 April 2017)
• According to some expert opinions, the ecstasy of neutral love is always compatible with devotional service in chivalry  + (18:12:47, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of compassion in devotional service a mixture of anger or parental love is compatible, whereas a mixture of laughter, conjugal love or astonishment is always incompatible  + (18:14:29, 30 April 2017)
• Still another question may be raised: If Maha-Visnu cannot see Krsna, then how was Krsna obliged to come before Him after all to take back the sons of the brahmana?  + (18:15:29, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of anger in devotional service a mixture of compassion or chivalry is compatible, whereas a mixture of laughter, conjugal union or dread is completely incompatible  + (18:16:16, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of dread in devotional service a mixture of ghastliness or compassion is compatible  + (18:17:33, 30 April 2017)
• The answer is that Lord Krsna went to see Lord Maha-Visnu not exactly to take away the sons of the brahmana but only for Arjuna's sake  + (18:18:43, 30 April 2017)
• With the ecstasy of chivalry in devotional service a mixture of conjugal union, laughter or anger is always incompatible  + (18:19:06, 30 April 2017)
• In the ecstasy of ghastliness in devotional service, feelings of neutral love, laughter or servitude are compatible, whereas feelings of conjugal union and fraternity are incompatible  + (18:21:00, 30 April 2017)
• His friendship with Arjuna was so intimate that when Arjuna prepared himself to die by entering a fire, Krsna wanted to give him complete protection  + (18:22:00, 30 April 2017)
• The above analysis is a sample of the study of rasabhasa, or incompatible mixing of rasas. This transcendental science of rasabhasa can thoroughly explain the humors in ecstatic love which are compatible and incompatible with one another  + (18:23:48, 30 April 2017)
• Arjuna, however, would not desist from entering the fire unless the sons of the brahmana were brought back. Therefore Krsna promised him, "I shall bring back the brahmana's sons. Do not try to commit suicide"  + (18:25:33, 30 April 2017)
• When Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu was residing in Jagannatha Puri, many poets and devotees used to come to Him and offer their different kinds of poetry  + (18:26:17, 30 April 2017)
• The regulation was that Lord Caitanya's secretary, Svarupa Damodara, first examined all of these writings scrutinizingly  + (18:28:04, 30 April 2017)