The mistake of the Māyāvāda philosophy is that "You are the same." You are the same in which way? I am the same in quality, not in quantity. Just like if I say: "You are as good as President Nixon," there is nothing wrong, because you are American, he is American. Is there anything wrong? From the point of view American citizenship, you are as good as President Nixon.
But when you go deep into the matter, you will find, oh, you are far, far away from President Nixon. Similarly, we are identifying ourself with this matter, but Vedas says that, "You are not matter. You are supreme spirit soul." Not supreme; "You are spirit soul." That understanding is tat tvam asi.
You have to understand ahaṁ brahmāsmi: "I am Brahman. I am not matter." Our disease is that I am identifying with this matter, "I am this material body," which is foreign to me. This is the beginning of the Bhagavad-gītā instruction that, "You are not this body." Tat tvam asi: "You are spirit soul." So we also, we have to accept. We are accepting that "I am not this body; I am spirit soul." But my constitutional position is part and parcel of the supreme whole.
So just like big gold mine and a small particle of gold. That small particle of gold is also gold. But that does not mean it has the same value as the gold mine. Tat tvam asi. Just like a drop of sea water. Chemical composition is the same. Salty taste is the same.
Similarly, if you can understand yourself, then you can understand even God. If you study yourself that, "Although I am very small . . ." What to speak of myself? Even a small ant, it has got individuality. The ant is going on. You stop it, it will struggle. That means it wants to keep its individuality.
Therefore if you are the same, then God is also individual. He is not impersonal. Immediately you can understand. How you can . . .? I have got so much . . . I am so small, tiny—still, I have got my individuality, personality, and how God can be impersonal? Even a commonsense man can understand.
If I have got tendency to love nice girls and dance with him, er, her, or a girl—everyone is individual—why God shall not be? He must have that tendency. Otherwise wherefrom this tendency comes? Because I am part and parcel of God, unless the tendency is there, wherefrom I get this tendency? So if you simply try to understand the tat tvam asi, you can immediately understand your position and God. It is so nice.